|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
July 31, 2006 - News The last time we wrote, we asked you to support conservative Ken MERCER for the Texas State Board of Education. If you haven't already heard, Ken was elected by a landslide thanks in part to your help. Now Kansas needs your help. Today. Who do you know who lives in Kansas? Tomorrow, August 1st, the next battle in the ongoing evolution wars will be decided. The dogmatic Darwinists, led by a closed-minded organization (mis)named “Kansas Citizens for Science” is fighting hard to unseat conservative Christians who currently hold a bare majority on the Kansas State Board of Education, (KSBE) loosely equivalent to our own Texas State Board of Education. (See details below voters guide). .....................................................................................................
Here are the candidates in the more important races that I would support. A Kansas School Board district map is located at http://www.ksde.org/commiss/bdmem.html
Please alert friends or family you know who may
be able to vote in the
.....................................................................................................
The Details:
The Darwinian “thought police” have resorted to propaganda, distortions, outright lies, and recently, trying to confuse voters into voting for the wrong candidate. (A recent Kansas City Star article even implied that those conservative Christians who support “intelligent design” are supporting an atheistic view of science! ) Why would the Darwinists resort to such deception and confusion and why would the KCStar print it? Answer: Because they know they are wrong and can not win against the truth—just as this same group refused to debate or even provide scientific witnesses for their dogmatic view of “evolution is all there is in the world”.
They have even brought in their ‘big guns’ and heeded advice from, of all
places,
Here are the facts:
1.
The current conservative KSBE has passed voluntary science
standards for local independent school districts to use. These
standards, much like the
2. The challengers have pledged to repeal these “teach the controversy” standards – for most of them this is the only reason they are running.
3. The newspapers are calling the challengers “moderates”…as in being “moderate” like Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, Teddy Kennedy or the ACLU would be called moderate – all of whom hold similar views on these issues.
4. The position of the science standards—that of a thorough and critical examination of both strengths and weaknesses of evolution, is one supported by the vast majority of Americans—typically over 80% of your neighbors—including those who describe themselves as evolutionists, support teaching the controversy. Very few, typically less than 20% and often only 10% of people prefer a Godless evolution taught in science classes, and guess what the majority of those people are, religiously speaking?
5.
Those who are distorting things now by saying they are for better science,
did not even show up at the
6.
The current
7.
The current
8.
The current
9.
The current
10. The Darwinists are fighting in both political parties. They cannot tolerate teaching kids that they didn’t evolve from apes. They hardly get along with anyone outside the ACLU, the most liberal Democrats, the communist party (literally), and of course, atheist groups.
11. The conservatives have also pushed through conservative Christian reforms on things such as sex education, history curriculum, charter schools, and a general focus on back to the basics. The so-called moderates cannot tolerate parents having power over what their kids are taught or in breaking the monopoly the ACLU and the NEA have had over the schools.
12. Intelligent design does not promote atheism. The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection. While many conservative Christians view this as more compatible with their beliefs than a godless “molecules-to-man” evolution, ID theory does not take an explicit position on who or what the intelligent cause is—just that scientific evidence is best explained by intelligent causes rather than by undirected random chance processes. Atheists do not believe that ID is compatible with their beliefs.
13. An online petition is available to express your support for the ‘teach the controversy’ science standards (supported by conservatives). It is located at www.standupforscience.org.
There is also streaming audio of radio commercials at the links below. Click here to hear commercial #1. Click here to hear commercial #2.
Thank you for your help. Sorry for the length. We will get back to Texas issues next time. Much has happened -- mostly good! We may not win every single battle but the Truth is winning the overall war!
Very truly yours,
Mark +++
Mark Ramsey Founder, Texans for Better Science Education www.strengthsandweaknesses.org
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||